<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Wrote the Book of Love?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mothering21.com/2010/02/21/who-wrote-the-book-of-love/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mothering21.com/2010/02/21/who-wrote-the-book-of-love/</link>
	<description>A beat blog for &#34;parenting&#34; the over-21 set</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:31:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Back to Their Future &#171; Mothering21</title>
		<link>http://mothering21.com/2010/02/21/who-wrote-the-book-of-love/comment-page-1/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>Back to Their Future &#171; Mothering21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 04:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mothering21.com/?p=452#comment-296</guid>
		<description>[...] a book club of young mothers in New Jersey (among them, my former babysitter) shelved its regularly scheduled programming to have an anxious summit on how they may have already [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a book club of young mothers in New Jersey (among them, my former babysitter) shelved its regularly scheduled programming to have an anxious summit on how they may have already [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vivien Orbach-Smith</title>
		<link>http://mothering21.com/2010/02/21/who-wrote-the-book-of-love/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivien Orbach-Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 05:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mothering21.com/?p=452#comment-235</guid>
		<description>Far be it from me to go head-to-head with my esteemed friend and rabbi, Hanoch, who clearly outranks me in the parenting, grandparenting and matchmaking departments (and countless others).  To clarify, however: I didn&#039;t see the babysitter&#039;s parents as abdicating. Had she not come to her senses that this young man was not right for her (and I chose not to go into the details, partly because I didn&#039;t want to violate a reader&#039;s privacy, and also because, frankly, I don&#039;t exactly remember them)... I don&#039;t think her parents would have stood by silently - and I certainly don&#039;t think they would&#039;ve bankrolled.  What I thought they did brilliantly, early in the romance, was to state their case  forthrightly, planting the seed of doubt and disapproval in their child&#039;s mind, without OVER-reacting - i.e., immediately demonizing the BF, whipping up a Romeo and Juliet/it&#039;s-us-and-our-misunderstood-love-against-the-cruel-world frenzy. (Which was kind of how it went down with foolish me and [&quot;Won&#039;t-You-Marry-Me&quot;] Bill.)  
But what&#039;s a parent to do when a child stays hellbent on buying those hurting shoes? That&#039;s a different scenario than the one I chose to examine in this post. Perhaps more readers will weigh in on it with words of wisdom and/or tales from the trenches. HT, thanks for commenting,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Far be it from me to go head-to-head with my esteemed friend and rabbi, Hanoch, who clearly outranks me in the parenting, grandparenting and matchmaking departments (and countless others).  To clarify, however: I didn&#8217;t see the babysitter&#8217;s parents as abdicating. Had she not come to her senses that this young man was not right for her (and I chose not to go into the details, partly because I didn&#8217;t want to violate a reader&#8217;s privacy, and also because, frankly, I don&#8217;t exactly remember them)&#8230; I don&#8217;t think her parents would have stood by silently &#8211; and I certainly don&#8217;t think they would&#8217;ve bankrolled.  What I thought they did brilliantly, early in the romance, was to state their case  forthrightly, planting the seed of doubt and disapproval in their child&#8217;s mind, without OVER-reacting &#8211; i.e., immediately demonizing the BF, whipping up a Romeo and Juliet/it&#8217;s-us-and-our-misunderstood-love-against-the-cruel-world frenzy. (Which was kind of how it went down with foolish me and ["Won't-You-Marry-Me"] Bill.)<br />
But what&#8217;s a parent to do when a child stays hellbent on buying those hurting shoes? That&#8217;s a different scenario than the one I chose to examine in this post. Perhaps more readers will weigh in on it with words of wisdom and/or tales from the trenches. HT, thanks for commenting,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hanoch Teller</title>
		<link>http://mothering21.com/2010/02/21/who-wrote-the-book-of-love/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Hanoch Teller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 03:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mothering21.com/?p=452#comment-234</guid>
		<description>As always, Vivien tells a beautiful tale, teaching me a few words (that even Mr. Webster doesn&#039;t know) along the way. Alas, what to do, if parents see a disasterous relationship forming and they have not dropped a time-relased metaphor/analogy along the way?
Me thinks that parents must internalize that the best spouse for their children is what is best for them, and never create a dynamic that the child will chose to spite the parent. But what if the child maintaines that what is best for her is disasterousky suited for her? I do not believe it would be prudent for the parents to adopt the hope-for-the-best approach of the parents of Vivien&#039;s babysitter.
Even after reading their child their Miranda Rights, they still do not have the privilege of abdicating under the rationalization, &quot;I&#039;ve done all that I can do?&quot; There are no shortage of analogies to invoke to convey this idea, for I think we all understand that a a parent may not remain silent as they sanction and bankroll hurting shoes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always, Vivien tells a beautiful tale, teaching me a few words (that even Mr. Webster doesn&#8217;t know) along the way. Alas, what to do, if parents see a disasterous relationship forming and they have not dropped a time-relased metaphor/analogy along the way?<br />
Me thinks that parents must internalize that the best spouse for their children is what is best for them, and never create a dynamic that the child will chose to spite the parent. But what if the child maintaines that what is best for her is disasterousky suited for her? I do not believe it would be prudent for the parents to adopt the hope-for-the-best approach of the parents of Vivien&#8217;s babysitter.<br />
Even after reading their child their Miranda Rights, they still do not have the privilege of abdicating under the rationalization, &#8220;I&#8217;ve done all that I can do?&#8221; There are no shortage of analogies to invoke to convey this idea, for I think we all understand that a a parent may not remain silent as they sanction and bankroll hurting shoes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elisa Swiller</title>
		<link>http://mothering21.com/2010/02/21/who-wrote-the-book-of-love/comment-page-1/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Elisa Swiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mothering21.com/?p=452#comment-232</guid>
		<description>beautiful - I hope I can remember your great insights...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>beautiful &#8211; I hope I can remember your great insights&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

